Politics and Policy of the Science of Reading: A Bibliography
Compiled by Jill Kerper Mora, Ed.D.
San Diego State University
Aukerman, M., & Schuldt, L. C. (2021). What matters most? Toward a robust and socially just Science of Reading. Reading Research Quarterly, 56, S85-S103. https://doi.org/doi:10.1002/rrq.406
Aydarova, E. (2024). What you see is not what you get: Science of Reading reforms as a guise for standardization, centralization, and privatization. American Journal of Education, 130(4), 653-685.
Aydarova, E. (2023). “Whatever you want to call it”: Science of Reading mythologies in the education reform movement. Harvard Educational Review, 93(4), 556-581. https://doi.org/10.17763/1943-5045-93.4.556
Aydarova, E. (2021). Building a one-dimensional teacher: Technocratic transformations in teacher education policy discourses. Educational Studies, 57(6), 670-689.
Aydarova, E., & Berliner, D. C. (2018). Navigating the contested terrain of teacher education policy and practice: Introduction to the Special Issue. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 26(25), 1-10.
Aydarova, E., Rigney, J., & Dana, N. F. (2022). “If you’re not at the table, you’re on the menu.”: Learning to participate in policy advocacy as a teacher educator. Action in Teacher Education, 44(2), 143-159.
Bogenschneider, K., Day, E., & Parrott, E. (2019). Revisiting theory on research use: Turning to policymakers for fresh insights. American Psychologist, 74(7), 778-793.
Buenrostro, M. (2024). The state of English Learners in California public schools. Californians Together.
Compton-Lilly, C. F., Spence, L. K., Thomas, P. L., & Decker, S. l. (2023). Stories grounded in decades of research: What we truly know about the teaching of reading. The Reading Teacher, 77(3), 392-400.
Disotuar, D., Lazrow, S., Holmes-Ware, E., & Henning, C. (2025). Equity and the Science of Reading. Children’s Literacy Initiative. https://leo.gradelevelreading.net/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/Equity-and-the-Science-of-Reading-9.2024-report-1-1.pdf
Escamilla, K., & Strong, K. (2024). Voices from the field: Impact of the implementation of the Science of Reading instruction and policy on emergent bilingual/English learner literacy programs and teachers. National Committee for Effective Literacy.
Goodwin, A. P., & Jiménez, R. T. (2020). The Science of Reading: Supports, critique, and questions. Reading Research Quarterly, 55(S1), S7-S16. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.360
Hoffman, J. V., Cabell, S. Q., Barrueco, S., Hollins, E. R., & Pearson, P. D. (2021). Critical issues in the Science of Reading: Striving for a wide-angle view in research. Literacy Research: Theory, Method and Practice, 70, 87-105.
Hoffman, J. V., Hikida, M., & Sailors, M. (2020). Contesting science that silences: Amplifying equity, agency, and design research in literacy teacher preparation. Reading Research Quarterly, 55(S1), S255-S266.
Hruby, G. G. (2012). Three requirements for justifying an educational neuroscience. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 1-23.
Kittle, J., Amendum, S. J., & Buddle, C. M. (2024). What does research say about the Science of Reading for K-5 multilingual learners? A systematic review of systematic reviews. Educational Psychology Review, 36, 1-31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-024-09942-6
MacPhee, D., Handsfield, L. J., & Paugh, P. (2021). Conflict or conversation? Media portrayals of the science of reading. Reading Research Quarterly, 56(S1), S145-S155.
Mora, J. K. (2025). A multilingual educator’s critique of the Science of Reading. Multilingual Educator, CABE 50th Anniversary, 41-43.
Mora, J. K. (2023). To cue or not to cue: Is that the question? Language Magazine, June, 18-20.
Mora, J. K., Lampkin, E., Flores, B., & Flemington, A. (2024). Pushing back against Science of Reading mandates: The California story. CCTE Fall 2024 Research Monograph, 47-58.
Newkirk, T. (2024). The broken logic of “Sold a Story”: A personal response to “The Science of Reading.”. Literacy Research Commons(Resources). https://literacyresearchcommons.org
Noguerón-Liu, S. (2020). Expanding the knowledge base in literacy instruction and assessment: Biliteracy and translanguaging perspectives from families, communities, and classrooms. Reading Research Quarterly, 55(S1), S307-S318.
Pearson, P. D. (2004). The Reading Wars. Educational Policy, 18(1), 216-252.
Reinking, D., Hruby, G. G., & Risko, V. J. (2023). Legislating phonics. Settled science or political polemics. Teachers College Record, 125(1), 104-131.
Rich, D. S. (2023). Reading Recovery is the science(s) and art of teaching. The Journal of Reading Recovery, 23(2), 33-40.
Share, D. (2021). Is the Science of Reading just the Science of Reading English? Reading Research Quarterly, 56(S1), S391-S402.
Semingson, P. K., William. (2021). Where is the evidence? Looking back to Jeanne Chall and enduring debates about the Science of Reading. Reading Research Quarterly, 56(S1), S157-!169. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.405
Tierney, R. J., & Pearson, P. D. (2024). Fact-checking the Science of Reading: Opening up the conversation. Literacy Research Commons. https://literacyresearchcommons.org
Thomas, P. L. (2022). The science of reading movement: The never-ending debate and the need for a different approach to reading instruction. N. E. P. Center. http://nepc.colorado.edu/publication/science-of-reading
Thomas, P. L. (2022). How to end the reading war and serve the literacy needs of all students: A primer for parents, policy makers, and people who care (Second ed.). Information Age Publishing.
Wagner, L., Patson, N. D., & Awani, S. (2022). What does the public think about language science? Project Muse: Language, 98(4), e224-e249. https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2022.0029
Williams, J. L. (2024). Getting history right: The tale of three-cueing. The Journal of Reading Recovery, 24, 17-28. https://readingrecovery.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/Getting-history-right_The-tale-of-three-cueing-by-Jeff-Williams-1.pdf
Yaden, D. B., Reinking, D., & Smagorinsky, P. (2021). The trouble with binaries: A perspective on the Science of Reading. Reading Research Quarterly, 56(S1), S119-S129.